Trust 4781, or T4781, originates
from Elkhart, Indiana, where founders Will Lipscomb and Steve Wall are
currently hard at work preserving distressed buildings in the city’s historic
districts. The duo find themselves doing
what they love in neighborhoods they find fresh and intriguing for ethnic diversity,
history, and old-style craftsmanship.
Lipscomb grew up
in LaGrange, Indiana, near his present home in Mongo, a small town bordering Pigeon
River Fish & Wildlife Area. After
working in the airline industry and attending Pittsburgh’s Pennsylvania
Culinary Institute, he returned to Indiana as a chef and entrepreneurial bistro
owner. In 2007, he began shifting the
focus of his Common Plea Bistro and Bakery from lunch services to establishing
a presence at local farmers markets, combining talents for baked goods and
gardening. At the time, it was a bonding
experience for him with a foster child he was hosting, but he quickly
established a reputation for quality baked goods with weekenders heading to the
lake.
Wall came to Elkhart
in a more roundabout fashion, attending Georgetown University before working
for the railroad as a property manager and establishing a side business as a
non-profit consultant. After several
moves between Minneapolis and Chicago, Wall, who grew up on a Mennonite
farmstead in Montana, finally chose to resettle in Elkhart due to its
traditional Mennonite population and easy access to Chicago. Purposefully buying a fixer-upper, Wall
freely admits that some of the buildings he is working to stabilize in Elkhart are
a bit more challenging that he was hoping, but has nonetheless found himself
fascinated by the neighborhoods in which he lives and works. “At first, I was worried I’d be a bit bored
out here, but that has definitely not been a problem,” he reflects.
Lipscomb and Wall
met in Elkhart where they quickly began helping each other out with building
projects. “It’s just a lot easier with
two persons – everything from having someone to bounce ideas off of to having
someone help carry sheetrock,” they both quickly agree.
A building targeted for rehabilitation in Cincinnati. |
Lipscomb came to
T4781 with projects in other areas, including a duplex he is remodeling in
Cincinnati. On a trip through the city,
he fell in love with Over-the-Rhine (OTR), an historic German-heritage district
known for its ornate abandoned buildings.
There he met Kelsey Hillebrand, a professional architect who shares his
passion for OTR and served as guide in Lipscomb’s quest to become part of the
revitalization effort.
The idea for a
non-profit arose as Lipscomb and Wall contemplated buildings they purchased
through a tax sale. They seem more
concerned with preserving interesting structures and contributing to the neighborhoods
around them than with maximizing profits.
“We’re definitely not in this to flip houses,” they agree, “by working
together we actually hope to be able to work with buildings that are too
challenging for others, or that promise too little return for other types of
investors.” In fact, one of Lipscomb’s
key criteria seems to be lack of a roof or a tree growing through the porch,
references to the dilapidated state of his current home, Mongo House, before he
purchased the property and restored it in 2004.
They also consider
issues outside of the structures themselves.
“We need businesses, jobs, and gardens,” they contend. “It’s not enough to tear down or to paint a
few houses, what we really need are comprehensive efforts to keep things
together, things that corporate investors and banks seem to devalue, like trees,
diversity, access to gardens and fresh produce, and just having neighbors who
look out for each other.”
Wall is quick to
point out that many of the so-called problems in these neighborhoods are
actually widely exaggerated by outsiders who don’t live in them. “There’s a perennial story of being mugged
around here. Almost everyone claims to
have been “almost mugged” here,” he notes with a smirk, “but I’m not sure they
actually understand what a mugging really is.”
Both Wall and Lipscomb have lived and worked in large cities with no
problems.
Lipscomb’s
favorite anecdote is about the children with the gardens. “One day I was working in the garden and
these kids came up and asked why I was playing in the dirt. I was going to reply sarcastically to them
when I realized that they really didn’t know what I was doing – they had no
idea about gardening or plants, or probably even where their food comes
from.”
“Also,” he is
quick to continue, “is the problem with flowers. We can’t keep flowers at the properties
because they are picked as soon as they bloom.
The kids are so starved for nature and connecting with it that they no
longer know how to,” noting that the kids often accidently kill the plants they
are seeking to admire.
T4781 comes from
the realization that in addressing all of these issues, the two find themselves
needing to look at things from both the bottom-line profitability of the
business world and the altruistic non-profitability of educational outreach and
neighborhood building. Both sides, they
claim, pay dividends, but in very different ways that often escape the
accounting of corporate investors, large banks, and even well-intentioned city
officials.
“We also need more
alternatives,” they note. “Some of the
larger non-profits that also work in our neighborhoods are really good at
certain things, such as raising money to board up or tear down dangerous
buildings, but that doesn’t mean that their approach is healthy for all
buildings or all neighborhoods. There’s
a point at which you need to stop tearing everything down and start preserving
things before it’s all gone.” On the
business-side, they are equally quick to point out the lack of solid options to
invest in neighborhood stabilization as opposed to gentrification.
“Cities often talk
about rebuilding on certain lots they have just torn down, but they don’t seem
to understand the difficulties in raising financing under those
conditions. In order to replace
structures now being torn down, the city will have to displace all those who
cannot afford to pay the rents necessary to justify new buildings. We can buy and rehab an existing structure
for $40,000, but you simply cannot afford new construction at that price, and
higher future rents have to be based on the new financials in order to obtain
financing. What we need is stabilization
without gentrification.”
Apples also played
a key role in the decision to establish T4781.
Lipscomb and Wall sell apples and garden produce along with baked goods
at local farmers markets. Noting the
number of vacant lots around some of their buildings, they have asked cities
such as Elkhart to support establishment of urban orchards on some of the
properties. It seems to be a good idea
addressing concerns for food availability, basic nutrition, food education,
green space, open urban space and returning vacant lots to viable and
productive uses – increasingly identified as a key component in the war to keep
drugs, crime and gangs out of distressed neighborhoods.
Wall's home in Elkhart had been vacant for several years. |
Their original
idea was to use their businesses to establish orchards on vacant lots in Elkhart,
orchards that would be established with a strong focus on meeting neighborhood
nutritional needs while educating consumers about farms, orchards and even
different varietals. “We want to
reconnect the neighborhood to the land and to their food,” they explain.
The idea has
worked in cities such as Detroit, Chicago and New York.
Their end goal was
that the orchards would eventually be donated to non-profits to maintain as
green and open spaces in support of the established educational outreach. Lipscomb and Wall eventually realized that they
could greatly simplify their efforts and work more easily with other
non-profits by simply establishing a non-profit to direct the projects and to
own the orchards from the outset.
Cities prefer to
work with non-profits and establishment of T4781 would allow for a strategic
division of labor. The business side can
work to establish, help manage, and market the orchards, while the non-profit
can work to develop programming, nutritional outreach, and local food support
while making long-term ownership decisions in support of the neighborhoods’
larger social needs.
“It’s a win-win,”
points out Wall, “if we are going to run our businesses like non-profits, it
seems more effective to just establish non-profits in the first place, and run
them using smart business practices.”
“Non-profits have
other benefits,” adds Lipscomb, “In the business world, if you want to include
someone in a project, you either have to pay them or they have to have money to
invest. In a non-profit, you can work
with people who share your interest and enthusiasm without the money issue.”
And that is
seemingly what they have done in establishing a board including Hillebrand, a
professional architect with a heart for old buildings, and William Ames, a
chemist with a passion for urban food production.
“Others are
considering becoming involved,” Wall promises, “but first we need to focus on
the small details, such as raising money, establishing best practices, and
obtaining access to projects such as the apple orchards in Elkhart. I’m confident that whatever we get ourselves
into, our team will grow to include the expertise and experience necessary to
make it a success.”
“And we still have
our own businesses to manage. I just got
new banners for the market in Goshen. We
will still be there every Saturday, the one day we aren’t painting, pruning, mowing
or cleaning up the buildings,” Lipscomb concludes.
If anyone can
successfully revitalize a street using fresh paint, apple trees and Amish-style
pies, it will be probably be Lipscomb, Wall and the team of fresh talent behind
T4781.
No comments:
Post a Comment